ESPN has a predictably horrified article about a
motion to dismiss the frivolous US Women's National Soccer pay imbalance lawsuit, which raises important (and one would hope, obvious) points about difficulty of skill required to play in those leagues:
The motion filed on behalf of U.S. Soccer on Monday reiterated a
number of objections made throughout the lawsuit. But among the most
stark were repeated assertions that, regardless of any other
consideration, players from the two teams do not perform equal work --
either in terms of revenue potential or the actual physical labor
required.
As a result, U.S. Soccer said, women's players do not
qualify for relief under the Equal Pay Act or Title VII of the 1964
Civil Rights Act.
"The overall soccer-playing ability required to
compete at the senior men's national team level is materially influenced
by the level of certain physical attributes," the defense motion stated
at one point, "such as speed and strength, required for the job."
That
followed the original motion for summary judgment, in which U.S. Soccer
stated that women's players did not perform jobs requiring "equal
skill, effort and responsibility under similar working conditions."
That the lawsuit got this far is really astonishing, but that these things need to be pointed out is absurd:
- We already have pay in athletics distributed by ability, not just in the major leagues (starters generally make more money than relief pitchers) but in the overall professional leagues (MLB players make more than minor leaguers). So the principle is not, on its face, absurd, despite attorney Molly Levison's sneering at it as the product of a "Paleolithic era" mentality.
- Female soccer players get routinely beaten by high school boys in the rare cases where they scrimmage together. This is of a piece with high school boys in track and field commonly breaking world record times by females.
- The USWNT exists entirely because of subsidies from MLS, which in turn is driven by the male game:
Professional soccer players are also paid by privately owned club
teams. Megan Rapinoe, for example, plays for Seattle Reign FC, one of
nine teams in the National Women's Soccer League (NWSL). Player's
salaries in the NWSL range from about $16,000 to $46,000 annually, according to NPR.
That's not a lot, and it's certainly less than even the lowest-paid
players in Major League Soccer (MLS; the top North American men's pro
soccer league), who earn a mandatory minimum salary of $60,000.
That
pay gap isn't the result of sexism. It's what the market allows. Major
League Soccer teams drew an average of 21,000 fans last year, while NWSL
games drew about 6,000. The TV contract MLS has with ESPN and other
broadcasters generates $90 million a year. While neither league
discloses revenue figures, it's a safe bet MLS earns considerably more—and, thus, its players do too.
For women to earn what men do, it's clear they need to get butts in the seats and watching on TV. So far, that hasn't happened. (Given some of the women's teams' fans, maybe there's a reason.)
- Those subsidies in fact are a big reason that the US women's team has won four World Cup titles, more than the US men's team ever (zero). Only a handful of countries pay their female soccer players, and this makes a huge difference in the quality and quantity of training the players can undertake. It puts the players in the interesting position of asking for more subsidy because they already get some.
It's hard to look at this situation and wonder what self-serving snake oil the women's team attorney offered her clients. The bottom line is still the bottom line, and at least one member of the women's team understands this:
"Fans can come to games," [Seattle Reign FC player Megan] Rapinoe said. "Obviously, the national team
games will be a hot ticket, but we have nine teams in the NWSL. You can
go to your league games, you can support that way. You can buy players'
jerseys, you can lend support in that way, you can tell your friends
about it, you can become season ticket-holders."
And that's it.
No comments:
Post a Comment