The Weekly Standard has a great takedown of a poll by the
Washington Post purporting to resurrect the hoary and multiply-discredited 1-in-5 rape/sexual assault statistic for young women on campus; it's old wine in new bottles, leavened with dubious anecdotes even as the lead example:
But the end of the article lets slip that in fact this, the paper’s lead example of a campus sexual assault, seems
instead to have been a regretful, but not atypical, drunken hookup that
neither party remembers well. The scary bleeding was apparently
self-inflicted when Sienkowski fell out of her loft bed onto the floor,
while the male was asleep. The person she brought back to her room
wasn’t a Michigan State student (and might not have been a college
student at all). And, the Post disclosed in the last 120 words
of a 2,870-word article, even Sienkowski conceded that “she doesn’t know
for sure whether she had wanted sex in the moment.” She said this after
seeing the police report, including photographs of the hickeys that the
accused said her lips had branded on his neck as evidence that she “was
very into everything that was happening.”
David French at the New Republic Online goes into more detail on the leading questions and assumptions in the poll:
First, the actual poll question was not limited to “sexual assault”
(a far more explosive term) but instead specifically asked respondents
about sexual assault or “unwanted sexual contact.” Unwanted sexual
contact is not a synonym for sexual assault. In fact, the term is so
broad that it can encompass behaviors that are not only not criminal,
but may not — depending on the circumstances — even constitute unlawful
sexual harassment (which the Supreme Court has said requires proof of
conduct so “severe, pervasive, and objectively offensive that it
effectively bars the victim’s access to an educational opportunity or
benefit.”)
... These definitions don’t come close to matching the legal definition of the various sex crimes prohibited by state laws... no, one in five college women have not told surveyors that they
were “sexually assaulted.” The negative experiences encompassed in the
definitions include everything from entirely lawful behavior, to sexual
harassment, to actual sex crimes. The numbers are troubling, to be sure,
but even the surveyed students themselves don’t see sexual assault as a
crisis — only 37 percent of them described it as a problem on campus.
(A much greater number of them — 56 percent — were concerned with
alcohol and drug use.) In fact, large majorities of students gave their
schools an “A” or “B” for their handling of sexual assault complaints.
The point, of course, is to feed the
panic machine that has been in operation since the 1980's (and
suspiciously invariant since then) and the bureaucracy jobs program that even now
develops its own tools. It has nothing to do with actual crime, and everything to do with seeking sinecures.
No comments:
Post a Comment