Reason's Robby Soave has
a good look at the new Title IX rules Betsy DeVos released today. A quick synopsis:
1) They define sexual misconduct more narrowly. ...
2) The new rules mandate cross-examination. Previous
guidance did not explicitly forbid cross-examination, but it heavily
discouraged the practice due to concern that questioning an alleged
sexual assault survivor would be re-traumatizing. The new rules state
that neither the accuser nor the accused need to be physically present
in the same room, but their attorneys—or support persons provided by the
university—must be allowed to submit questions on their behalf for the
other party to answer.
...
3) The new rules let colleges set their own evidentiary standards but require similar standards for non–Title IX adjudication.
That last one has already set off the laughably misnamed ACLU, who ran a
tweetstorm denouncing the revisions:
Of course,
FIRE came out in favor of the new regulations, but eliminating Federal policing of dating squabbles would have been better. Too bad we didn't get that, because
somebody has to pay for these busybodies on campus.
No comments:
Post a Comment